Everyone’s pro-death and some point, or we cover Everest in escalators. It’s all where the line between allowable risk and unacceptable risk is drawn.

No. There's a difference between saying:

A) The cost doesn't justify the benefits

and

B) There's too many humans anyway

The comment I responded to said B, not A.

That's what I mean by "pro death". Viewing it as a positive that we reduce the amount of humans by... random deaths from traffic?