FTA: the next part of our position is 1, and the square we should consult next is the third one.
Doesn't he mean the second one (again)?
This is a good article, but he really should have added an 8x8 illustration and/or mentioned his coordinates start at (0,0) in the upper left. And maybe picked a different point so the example doesn't end up going from the first square to the second to (I believe incorrectly) the third.
Doesn't he mean the second one (again)?
This is a good article, but he really should have added an 8x8 illustration and/or mentioned his coordinates start at (0,0) in the upper left. And maybe picked a different point so the example doesn't end up going from the first square to the second to (I believe incorrectly) the third.